← All Free ToolsGo back to previous tools page
Explore More Tools →
section15.606

Agency procedures

Overview

This section prescribes the mandatory framework for how federal agencies must manage unsolicited proposals, including the establishment of formal internal procedures and designated points of contact. It outlines a two-stage process—an initial screening for basic viability followed by a detailed comprehensive evaluation—while emphasizing the protection of the offeror's proprietary data.

Key Rules

  • Procedural Requirements: Agencies must establish formal controls for the receipt, evaluation, and disposal of proposals, specifically to protect data identified as restricted or proprietary.
  • Designated Points of Contact (POC): Agencies are required to appoint specific individuals to coordinate the handling and flow of unsolicited proposals.
  • Initial Review Thresholds: Before a full evaluation, the POC must verify seven criteria, including mission relevance, technical/cost sufficiency, proper proprietary markings, and authorization by a responsible official.
  • Formal Rejection: If a proposal fails the initial review, the agency must promptly notify the offeror in writing, stating the reasons for rejection and the intended disposition of the documents.
  • Comprehensive Evaluation Factors: Evaluators must specifically analyze the proposal's innovation, the offeror's unique capabilities, the experience of key personnel, and the realism of the proposed costs.
  • Proprietary Legend: The agency POC must ensure that any proposal circulated for evaluation bears the protective markings required by FAR 15.609 to prevent unauthorized disclosure.

Practical Implications

  • Gatekeeping Function: The rigorous initial review acts as a "filter" that allows agencies to quickly discard proposals that are incomplete or merely attempt to bypass competitive bidding for existing requirements.
  • Substantive Burden on Offerors: Contractors must ensure their proposals are not only technically innovative but also meticulously compliant with administrative markings and mission alignment, or they risk immediate rejection without a technical reading.
  • Internal Coordination: The requirement for a central POC prevents "rogue" evaluations by technical offices and ensures that the government's receipt of sensitive intellectual property is tracked and controlled.

Need help?

Get FAR guidance, audit prep support, and proposal insights from the AudCor team.

Talk to an expert