← All Free ToolsGo back to previous tools page
Explore More Tools →

Overview

This section prescribes policies and procedures for assessing financial penalties against contractors who include expressly unallowable indirect costs in their final rate proposals or fixed-price incentive contract cost statements. It serves as a deterrent to ensure contractors exercise due diligence in scrubbing unallowable costs from their overhead submissions.

Key Rules

  • Applicability: Applies to contracts exceeding $1 million, excluding firm-fixed-price contracts without cost incentives and any firm-fixed-price contracts for commercial products or services.
  • Level 1 Penalty (Expressly Unallowable): If a cost is expressly unallowable under FAR cost principles, the penalty equals the disallowed cost allocated to the covered contracts plus interest on any paid portion.
  • Level 2 Penalty (Previously Determined): If a cost was determined unallowable for that specific contractor prior to the proposal submission (e.g., via a previous DCAA Form 1, CO final decision, or court ruling), the penalty is two times the amount of the disallowed cost.
  • Interest Calculation: Interest is generally computed from the midpoint of the contractor’s fiscal year using Treasury-specified rates until the date of the demand letter.
  • Waiver Criteria: The Contracting Officer (CO) must waive penalties if the contractor withdraws the proposal before an audit begins, if the penalized cost is $10,000 or less, or if the contractor demonstrates robust internal controls and the error was inadvertent.
  • Reporting: Evidence of "knowing" submissions of unallowable costs must be referred to appropriate criminal investigative organizations.

Practical Implications

  • Stringent Internal Controls: Contractors must maintain rigorous internal review systems and training programs to identify and exclude unallowable costs, as the "due care" defense for a waiver requires proof of such systems.
  • Financial Risk: Because penalties apply even if the unallowable costs have not yet been paid, contractors face significant financial liability simply by submitting an inaccurate proposal.
  • Audit Readiness: The "point of no return" for a voluntary withdrawal waiver is the formal initiation of an audit (e.g., an entrance conference), making it critical for contractors to perform "scrubs" before the DCAA arrives.

Need help?

Get FAR guidance, audit prep support, and proposal insights from the AudCor team.

Talk to an expert