← All Free ToolsGo back to previous tools page
Explore More Tools →
subpart50.2

Subpart 50.2 - Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002

FAR Subpart 50.2 implements the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act), which provides critical liability and risk

Overview

FAR Subpart 50.2 implements the Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002 (SAFETY Act), which provides critical liability and risk management protections to providers of anti-terrorism technologies. The subpart aims to incentivize the development and deployment of life-saving technologies by limiting the legal exposure of "sellers" in the event of an act of terrorism.

Key Rules

  • Voluntary Participation: Agencies cannot mandate that a contractor obtain SAFETY Act protections; the decision to apply for and obtain these protections rests solely with the offeror.
  • Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology (QATT): Protection applies to a broad range of "technologies," including products, equipment, software, and services (such as threat assessments and design services) designated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
  • Early Integration: Acquisition officials must consider SAFETY Act applicability as early as possible in the acquisition cycle, typically during the requirement definition phase.
  • Independence of Evaluation: A DHS determination that a technology qualifies for SAFETY Act protection is independent of the agency’s evaluation of whether that technology meets the specific technical requirements of a solicitation.
  • Contingent Offers & Awards:
    • Agencies generally cannot solicit offers contingent upon receiving SAFETY Act protection before award unless specific criteria are met (e.g., market research shows insufficient competition otherwise).
    • Awards "presuming" post-award designation require approval from the chief of the contracting office and consultation with DHS.

Responsibilities

  • Requiring Activity (Program Office):
    • Identifies potential technologies that may qualify for SAFETY Act protection.
    • Consults with DHS to determine if "block" designations or certifications exist.
    • Requests "Pre-qualification Designation Notices" from DHS once specifications are established.
    • Provides all DHS-related documentation and notices to the Contracting Officer.
  • Contracting Officer (CO):
    • Includes necessary SAFETY Act notices in pre-solicitation and solicitation documents.
    • Incorporates appropriate FAR provisions (52.250-2 through 52.250-5) based on DHS determinations.
    • Coordinates with DHS regarding timelines for evaluation if an award is to be made "presuming" future protection.
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS):
    • Sole authority to issue SAFETY Act designations and certifications.
    • Reviews streamlined applications triggered by pre-qualification notices.
    • Maintains the SAFETYAct.gov resource for block designations.

Practical Implications

In real-world contracting, the SAFETY Act serves as a powerful market-shaping tool. For high-risk requirements—such as airport security screening, cybersecurity for critical infrastructure, or stadium sensors—the lack of liability protection might deter top-tier innovators from bidding due to "bet-the-company" legal risks.

By utilizing Pre-qualification Designation Notices, a Contracting Officer can signal to the industry that the government has already done the legwork with DHS, significantly shortening the timeline for a vendor to receive legal protection. This increases competition and ensures the government has access to the most advanced anti-terrorism tools. Contractors should be aware that even if a technology is "pre-qualified," they must still submit a streamlined application to DHS to actually receive the individual liability benefits.

Need help?

Get FAR guidance, audit prep support, and proposal insights from the AudCor team.

Talk to an expert