← All Free ToolsGo back to previous tools page
Explore More Tools →

Overview

This section establishes a clear hierarchy for determining which government official is responsible for processing and executing novation and change-of-name agreements. The responsibility is primarily determined by whether the contracts are assigned to an Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) and which office holds the largest financial interest.

Key Rules

  • ACO Priority: If any affected contracts are already assigned to an Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), that ACO (or the Corporate ACO for multiple locations) is the lead for the agreement.
  • Dollar Balance Threshold: If no ACO is assigned, responsibility falls to the contracting officer managing the largest unsettled dollar balance (defined as the sum of unbilled amounts and billed but unpaid amounts).
  • Multiple Transferors: When multiple selling entities are involved, the ACO with the largest unsettled dollar balance takes the lead; if no ACO exists, the agency with the largest unsettled balance designates the responsible official.
  • Centralization: The rules are designed to consolidate the administrative process under a single authority rather than requiring the contractor to negotiate with every individual contracting officer.

Practical Implications

  • Streamlined Administration: Contractors undergoing a merger or acquisition only need to interface with one "lead" contracting officer, even if their contracts span multiple agencies or departments.
  • Financial Risk Management: By tying responsibility to the "largest unsettled dollar balance," the FAR ensures that the agency with the most significant financial exposure oversees the legal transfer of contract obligations.

Need help?

Get FAR guidance, audit prep support, and proposal insights from the AudCor team.

Talk to an expert