← All Free ToolsGo back to previous tools page
Explore More Tools →
section6.303

Justifications

Overview

This section prescribes the mandatory requirements, certifications, and specific content necessary for a "Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition" (J&A). It ensures that any departure from the standard requirement of full and open competition is documented, rationalized, and approved by authorized officials.

Key Rules

  • Mandatory Documentation: A Contracting Officer (CO) cannot begin sole-source negotiations or award a contract without a written justification that is certified for accuracy and approved by the required authority.
  • 8(a) Threshold: Sole-source awards under the 8(a) program exceeding $30 million require a formal written justification, specific approvals, and must be made public after award.
  • Shared Responsibility: Technical and requirements personnel are legally responsible for providing and certifying the accuracy and completeness of the data that supports the recommendation for a sole-source action.
  • Individual vs. Class Justifications: Justifications may cover a single contract or a class of contracts, though justifications based on "Public Interest" (6.302-7) must always be on an individual basis.
  • Timing for Urgency: For acquisitions under "Unusual and Compelling Urgency" (6.302-2), justifications may be prepared and approved after the contract award if prior preparation would cause unreasonable delay.
  • Content Requirements: A standard justification must include 12 specific elements, including market research results, a determination of fair and reasonable cost, and a description of actions taken to remove barriers to competition for future requirements.

Practical Implications

  • Audit Trail: The J&A serves as the primary legal record to defend the agency's decision against bid protests; if the "sufficient facts and rationale" required by 6.303-2 are weak, the procurement is highly vulnerable.
  • Technical Accountability: Since technical personnel must certify their data, they can be held accountable for "Gold Plating" specifications or providing biased data that restricts competition.
  • Market Research Mandate: The requirement to describe market research (or explain its absence) forces agencies to actively engage with the industry before claiming that only one source exists.

Need help?

Get FAR guidance, audit prep support, and proposal insights from the AudCor team.

Talk to an expert