← All Free ToolsGo back to previous tools page
Explore More Tools →

Overview

This section prescribes the mandatory procedures for the Cognizant Federal Agency Official (CFAO) to identify, notify, and resolve instances where a contractor fails to comply with Cost Accounting Standards (CAS). It outlines the formal process for determining the materiality of a noncompliance and the methodology for calculating the resulting cost impact to the Government.

Key Rules

  • Aggregate Protection: The CFAO must ensure that any contract price or cost adjustments protect the Government from increased costs in the aggregate and do not result in a recovery that exceeds the actual increased costs paid.
  • Strict Timelines: The CFAO has 15 days to act on an auditor's report of noncompliance, and the contractor generally has 60 days to respond to a notice of potential noncompliance or to submit a description of a corrective accounting change.
  • Two-Tiered Proposal System: Contractors must submit either a General Dollar Magnitude (GDM) proposal for a high-level estimate of the cost impact or a Detailed Cost-Impact (DCI) proposal for a contract-by-contract analysis if requested by the CFAO.
  • Calculation Methodology: Cost impacts must include all affected CAS-covered contracts (both open and closed), account for impacts on incentives, fees, and profits, and reflect the difference between the noncompliant practice and the compliant practice.
  • Interest Recovery: The Government is required to recover interest on any increased costs paid due to noncompliance, calculated from the date of overpayment to the date of repayment.
  • Immateriality Exception: If the CFAO determines the cost impact is immaterial, they may conclude the process without contract adjustments, provided the contractor is notified to correct the practice for the future.

Practical Implications

  • Administrative Burden: Contractors face a significant administrative workload when a noncompliance is determined, as they must perform complex historical reconciliations across their entire CAS-covered contract portfolio.
  • Aggregate Offsetting: Because calculations are made "in the aggregate," a contractor may be able to offset increased costs on some contracts with decreased costs on others, provided the net result protects the Government's interests.
  • Enforcement Risk: Failure to submit required proposals or correct noncompliant practices in a timely manner grants the CFAO the authority to apply remedies, including withholding payments or implementing unilateral price adjustments.

Need help?

Get FAR guidance, audit prep support, and proposal insights from the AudCor team.

Talk to an expert